One of Labour’s manifesto commitments is to nationalise energy supply. As a potential producer London Local Energy don’t have any skin in that game and remain neutral. But in the case of UK on- and off-shore oil and gas, the energy itself is already nationalised and has been since 1934- a policy success that some in Labour may not realise they had achieved.
All UK oil and gas is thus Crown property. The idea that greedy “frackers” simply want to make money is thus a little more nuanced. What we want is what you want: That the people’s resources are distributed fairly.
If LLE were allowed to explore, and then discover natural gas, the value of that gas would be taxed at roughly 50% via national and borough taxes and charges to the community. Continue reading For the many, not the few. A decision for the many, not the FoE.
In Yorkshire, Louise Hammond is so concerned that shale will industrialise the landscape that she traveled to Lancashire and got arrested there to prevent it.
Continue reading Looking, and failing, to find the industrialised landscape of UK onshore
This is the second part of the post I recently did for MyGridGB. Only the title has changed:
The demonstrably perverse outcome of environmental opposition to UK onshore gas.
One could simply jump to the end of this post to get the point: The lowest carbon natural gas is inarguably the nearest natural gas. If the UK continues to use natural gas, as it undoubtedly will for at least the next 15 years in generation and longer in heat, why choose to use high carbon natural gas?
The carbon intensity (CI) of UK electricity generation has been studied relentlessly, but little is known about the CI of natural gas. Much of this is due to both the physical nature of gas and how the provenance of UK natural gas is hard to define at any one point in time in a dynamic, constantly evolving marketplace. This from British Gas should be updated to 2016 figures of 79 BCM, mostly due to gas replacing coal, but the trends remain broadly true:
Continue reading The demonstrably perverse outcome of environmental opposition to UK onshore gas.
This was originally posted at MyGridGB. Part 2, titled “The inarguably perverse outcome of environmental opposition to UK onshore gas” will be up there shortly.
Although the concept of a dynamic level of carbon intensity in electricity is well known to readers of My Grid, natural gas has been left out of the equation, much the same as natural gas has been lumped, excuse the pun, alongside coal and oil as ‘just another fossil fuel’.
Natural gas has a wide range of Carbon Intensity (CI) even within the UK gas grid. The second part of this post will demonstrate how significant that is and how onshore natural gas in the UK is not a threat to emissions but the opposite: A way forward to decarbonise, as much as possible, UK natural gas supply. But first, we have to talk about gas in general and try to understand the antipathy some UK greens have against it.
Firstly as this chart from the International Energy Agency shows, natural gas is responsible for less than 20% of world carbon emissions from energy combustion. Natural gas is not perfect. But it’s not perfectly evil either. Continue reading Are there advantages of UK onshore natural gas?
Sometime soon, the UK will import LNG produced from US shale gas. Shale gas is over 60% of all US production, and over 90% of new wells use the combination of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing. It is no longer “unconventional” or “controversial” and is predicted to provide 70% of global natural gas production by 2040.
US LNG will have a carbon intensity (CI) approaching, and possibly exceeding that of coal when used in electricity generation. But gas from everywhere else – even as close as the UK North Sea- will also have a demonstrably higher CI. In short, the opposition of groups such as Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace and The Green Party to local production of UK onshore natural gas, contrary to what they strongly believe, causes significant increases in CO2 emissions on a local, national and global basis. Continue reading UK onshore natural gas is the lowest carbon natural gas possible: Shop Local First
This may not be the last post at No Hot Air, but it will be close enough. Within the next few weeks I’ll be concentrating on London Local Energy, and I may or may not have a blog there.
Going through a new door is a good time to understand what has happened in the past. I’ve had a ringside seat at the greatest energy transformation since the light bulb. I’ve been here talking about shale before anyone had ever heard of Josh Fox and Gasland. I was here when the “conventional” industry said shale would never work: it was too expensive, the decline rates were too high, it was just a flash in the pan.
Continue reading The End of Fracking. All over bar some shouting.
Deciding – or not – to explore for the UK’s onshore natural gas and oil reserves needs informed facts.
On Saturday March 4, the LNG carrier Gallina docked at the Isle of Grain Terminal 50 miles from London.
The Gallina’s arrival is inextricably linked to the lack of UK shale gas exploration. If exploration had been allowed, and production ensued, the Gallina would not be landing the cargo.
The Gallina’s gas is very high carbon, with a 20% to 30% higher CO2 footprint across the supply chain than locally produced UK gas.
The Gallina cargo left Peru on February 6, with a destination market as England. You can follow the progess here. Continue reading If not here, then where?
Here’s a story based on cultural anthropology, the study of human cultures. Culture is bottom up. The story of man is from individuals to families, to bands, to groups, to villages, to tribes, to cities to countries – and today to the world.
Deep in the Amazon rain forest there still remain uncontacted tribes, human who by choice or geography have no contact with the outside world. Some are near natural gas reserves:
Continue reading Un-contacted tribes of the forests
Imagine the celebration if even a single European country exceeded 50% of power generation from wind. On Twitter at least, we would never hear the end of it. Who needs onshore natural gas when we have so much wind would be the inevitable conclusion, an interpretation widely distributed to the Fourth Estate and the other temporal powers. That would lead aside of course that two thirds of natural gas, now imported even from the high carbon/zero tax Peruvian Amazon Rain Forest in deference to our own low carbon/high tax resources, is used not in generation but for domestic heating and industry. But the milestone is very significant all the same. It’s, as far as I’m concerned, a fantastic breakthrough.
This should be great news: The 52% share of wind generating electricity the other morning in the US South West Power Pool is inarguably an incredible achievement: Continue reading World’s greatest wind success story. Happening because of natural gas
Why should someone who wants to explore for shale gas in London care what’s going on in Scotland? Simply put, a ban on shale gas in Scotland would naturally make the case for shale in England and London harder. That’s not only because at the last census 90,000 Scottish people live in London (more than from Jamaica, Somalia or Sri Lanka). It disrupts the narrative of shale, so lets at least get the story straight.
There’s a consultation going on in Scotland on shale gas which will probably decide that exploration in Scotland may be OK, but hold off until after Cuadrilla and Third Energy’s results before taking any exploration plunge. Continue reading Scotland shale gas